Movement Disorders (revue)

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Rating scales for dystonia: A multicenter assessment

Identifieur interne : 003F68 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 003F67; suivant : 003F69

Rating scales for dystonia: A multicenter assessment

Auteurs : Cynthia L. Comella [États-Unis] ; Sue Leurgans [États-Unis] ; Joanne Wuu [États-Unis] ; Glenn T. Stebbins [États-Unis] ; Teresa Chmura [États-Unis]

Source :

RBID : ISTEX:766C1E4D4EAE02B7D28FBC775424BC27F5829518

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

The evaluation of dystonia requires a reliable rating scale. The widely used Fahn‐Marsden Scale (F‐M) has not been sufficiently tested across multiple centers and investigators. The Dystonia Study Group developed the Unified Dystonia Rating Scale (UDRS) and a Global Dystonia Rating Scale (GDS) to serve as instruments to assess dystonia severity. In this study, 25 dystonia experts evaluated the UDRS, F‐M, and GDS for internal consistency and reliability. One hundred dystonia patients were videotaped using a standardized videotape protocol. Each examiner rated 20 patients using the UDRS, F‐M, and GDS in random order. The examiner then assessed each scale for ease of use. Statistical analysis used Cronbach's α, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), generalized weighted κ statistic, and Kendall's coefficient of concordance. The UDRS, F‐M, and GDS showed excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's α 0.89–0.93) and good to excellent correlation among the raters (ICC range from 0.71–0.78). Inter‐rater agreement was fair to excellent (Kendall's 0.54–0.87; κ 0.37–0.91) being lowest for eyes, jaw, face, and larynx. The modifying ratings (Duration in the UDRS and Provoking Factor in the F‐M) showed less agreement than the motor severity ratings. Among scales, the total scores correlated (Pearson's r, 0.977–0.983). Overall, 74% of raters found the GDS the easiest to apply. The GDS with its simplicity and ease of application may be the most useful dystonia rating scale. © 2002 Movement Disorder Society

Url:
DOI: 10.1002/mds.10377


Affiliations:


Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)


Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en">Rating scales for dystonia: A multicenter assessment</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Comella, Cynthia L" sort="Comella, Cynthia L" uniqKey="Comella C" first="Cynthia L." last="Comella">Cynthia L. Comella</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Leurgans, Sue" sort="Leurgans, Sue" uniqKey="Leurgans S" first="Sue" last="Leurgans">Sue Leurgans</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Wuu, Joanne" sort="Wuu, Joanne" uniqKey="Wuu J" first="Joanne" last="Wuu">Joanne Wuu</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Stebbins, Glenn T" sort="Stebbins, Glenn T" uniqKey="Stebbins G" first="Glenn T." last="Stebbins">Glenn T. Stebbins</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Chmura, Teresa" sort="Chmura, Teresa" uniqKey="Chmura T" first="Teresa" last="Chmura">Teresa Chmura</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:766C1E4D4EAE02B7D28FBC775424BC27F5829518</idno>
<date when="2003" year="2003">2003</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1002/mds.10377</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/766C1E4D4EAE02B7D28FBC775424BC27F5829518/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000514</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">000514</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">002898</idno>
<idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0885-3185:2003:Comella C:rating:scales:for</idno>
<idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno>
<idno type="RBID">pubmed:12621634</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">003833</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Curation">003833</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Checkpoint">003660</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Merge">000A18</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Curation">000A18</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Checkpoint">000A18</idno>
<idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0885-3185:2003:Comella C:rating:scales:for</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">005B91</idno>
<idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno>
<idno type="RBID">Pascal:03-0239019</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">002511</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Curation">000810</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Checkpoint">002341</idno>
<idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0885-3185:2003:Comella C:rating:scales:for</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">005E87</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">003F68</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">003F68</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Rating scales for dystonia: A multicenter assessment</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Comella, Cynthia L" sort="Comella, Cynthia L" uniqKey="Comella C" first="Cynthia L." last="Comella">Cynthia L. Comella</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="2">
<country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Rush‐Presbyterian–St. Lukes Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois</wicri:regionArea>
<placeName>
<region type="state">Illinois</region>
</placeName>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Leurgans, Sue" sort="Leurgans, Sue" uniqKey="Leurgans S" first="Sue" last="Leurgans">Sue Leurgans</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="2">
<country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Rush‐Presbyterian–St. Lukes Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois</wicri:regionArea>
<placeName>
<region type="state">Illinois</region>
</placeName>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Wuu, Joanne" sort="Wuu, Joanne" uniqKey="Wuu J" first="Joanne" last="Wuu">Joanne Wuu</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="2">
<country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Rush‐Presbyterian–St. Lukes Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois</wicri:regionArea>
<placeName>
<region type="state">Illinois</region>
</placeName>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Stebbins, Glenn T" sort="Stebbins, Glenn T" uniqKey="Stebbins G" first="Glenn T." last="Stebbins">Glenn T. Stebbins</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="2">
<country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Rush‐Presbyterian–St. Lukes Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois</wicri:regionArea>
<placeName>
<region type="state">Illinois</region>
</placeName>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Chmura, Teresa" sort="Chmura, Teresa" uniqKey="Chmura T" first="Teresa" last="Chmura">Teresa Chmura</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="2">
<country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Rush‐Presbyterian–St. Lukes Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois</wicri:regionArea>
<placeName>
<region type="state">Illinois</region>
</placeName>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series>
<title level="j">Movement Disorders</title>
<title level="j" type="abbrev">Mov. Disord.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0885-3185</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1531-8257</idno>
<imprint>
<publisher>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher>
<pubPlace>New York</pubPlace>
<date type="published" when="2003-03">2003-03</date>
<biblScope unit="vol">18</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">3</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="303">303</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="312">312</biblScope>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">0885-3185</idno>
</series>
<idno type="istex">766C1E4D4EAE02B7D28FBC775424BC27F5829518</idno>
<idno type="DOI">10.1002/mds.10377</idno>
<idno type="ArticleID">MDS10377</idno>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt>
<idno type="ISSN">0885-3185</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en">
<term>Comparative study</term>
<term>Dystonia</term>
<term>Dystonia (diagnosis)</term>
<term>Evaluation scale</term>
<term>Female</term>
<term>Human</term>
<term>Humans</term>
<term>Male</term>
<term>Middle Aged</term>
<term>Multicenter study</term>
<term>Observer Variation</term>
<term>Psychometrics</term>
<term>Reproducibility of Results</term>
<term>Severity of Illness Index</term>
<term>Severity score</term>
<term>Test reliability</term>
<term>Videotape Recording</term>
<term>dystonia</term>
<term>movement disorder</term>
<term>outcome assessment</term>
<term>rating scale</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="diagnosis" xml:lang="en">
<term>Dystonia</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en">
<term>Female</term>
<term>Humans</term>
<term>Male</term>
<term>Middle Aged</term>
<term>Observer Variation</term>
<term>Reproducibility of Results</term>
<term>Severity of Illness Index</term>
<term>Videotape Recording</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Consistance interne</term>
<term>Dystonie</term>
<term>Echelle évaluation</term>
<term>Etude comparative</term>
<term>Etude multicentrique</term>
<term>Fidélité test</term>
<term>Homme</term>
<term>Indice gravité</term>
<term>Psychométrie</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Wicri" type="topic" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Homme</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
<langUsage>
<language ident="en">en</language>
</langUsage>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">The evaluation of dystonia requires a reliable rating scale. The widely used Fahn‐Marsden Scale (F‐M) has not been sufficiently tested across multiple centers and investigators. The Dystonia Study Group developed the Unified Dystonia Rating Scale (UDRS) and a Global Dystonia Rating Scale (GDS) to serve as instruments to assess dystonia severity. In this study, 25 dystonia experts evaluated the UDRS, F‐M, and GDS for internal consistency and reliability. One hundred dystonia patients were videotaped using a standardized videotape protocol. Each examiner rated 20 patients using the UDRS, F‐M, and GDS in random order. The examiner then assessed each scale for ease of use. Statistical analysis used Cronbach's α, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), generalized weighted κ statistic, and Kendall's coefficient of concordance. The UDRS, F‐M, and GDS showed excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's α 0.89–0.93) and good to excellent correlation among the raters (ICC range from 0.71–0.78). Inter‐rater agreement was fair to excellent (Kendall's 0.54–0.87; κ 0.37–0.91) being lowest for eyes, jaw, face, and larynx. The modifying ratings (Duration in the UDRS and Provoking Factor in the F‐M) showed less agreement than the motor severity ratings. Among scales, the total scores correlated (Pearson's r, 0.977–0.983). Overall, 74% of raters found the GDS the easiest to apply. The GDS with its simplicity and ease of application may be the most useful dystonia rating scale. © 2002 Movement Disorder Society</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<affiliations>
<list>
<country>
<li>États-Unis</li>
</country>
<region>
<li>Illinois</li>
</region>
</list>
<tree>
<country name="États-Unis">
<region name="Illinois">
<name sortKey="Comella, Cynthia L" sort="Comella, Cynthia L" uniqKey="Comella C" first="Cynthia L." last="Comella">Cynthia L. Comella</name>
</region>
<name sortKey="Chmura, Teresa" sort="Chmura, Teresa" uniqKey="Chmura T" first="Teresa" last="Chmura">Teresa Chmura</name>
<name sortKey="Leurgans, Sue" sort="Leurgans, Sue" uniqKey="Leurgans S" first="Sue" last="Leurgans">Sue Leurgans</name>
<name sortKey="Stebbins, Glenn T" sort="Stebbins, Glenn T" uniqKey="Stebbins G" first="Glenn T." last="Stebbins">Glenn T. Stebbins</name>
<name sortKey="Wuu, Joanne" sort="Wuu, Joanne" uniqKey="Wuu J" first="Joanne" last="Wuu">Joanne Wuu</name>
</country>
</tree>
</affiliations>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/MovDisordV3/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 003F68 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 003F68 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Santé
   |area=    MovDisordV3
   |flux=    Main
   |étape=   Exploration
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     ISTEX:766C1E4D4EAE02B7D28FBC775424BC27F5829518
   |texte=   Rating scales for dystonia: A multicenter assessment
}}

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23.
Data generation: Sun Jul 3 12:29:32 2016. Site generation: Wed Feb 14 10:52:30 2024